Search for: "Fields v. Department of Treasury"
Results 1 - 20
of 143
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2019, 10:15 am
Department of the Treasury, 567 U.S. 1 (2012), that patent practitioners may have overlooked. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 9:00 am
Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor, and Treasury, along with the Office of Personnel Management (the “Departments”). [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 6:34 am
United States, 09-837 (2011), the Supreme Court faced the issue of whether a Treasury Department rule (discussed below) is valid. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:58 am
Department of Commerce, Dkt. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 12:58 pm
The Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service have a strange relationship with Administrative Procedure Act notice-and-comment rulemaking procedures. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 6:00 pm
This is the same office that was unduly influenced by Henry Paulson and the Department of the Treasury in the Stoneridge case. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 9:02 am
Department of Treasury guidance will be crucial as states seek to navigate this new environment. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 12:03 pm
Department of the Interior, et al. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 10:23 am
These departments include the Coast Guard; the U.S. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 8:17 am
Corp. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 7:35 am
Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor, and Treasury, along with the Office of Personnel Management (the “Departments”). [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 1:30 am
Lord Hodge referred to the purpose of EU procurement law as being to “develop effective competition in the field of public contracts”. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:46 am
Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), an agency that interprets administrative regulations applicable to TRIA. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 9:25 am
Fields v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 10:57 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Laku, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1745 (16 July 2008) Wilson, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1754 (15 July 2008) Sivaraman, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 1736 (24 July 2008) Islam, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1740 (31 July 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Perry & Anor v Harris (A Minor) [2008] EWCA Civ 907 (31 July 2008) Jirehouse Capital & Anor v Beller & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 908 (30 July 2008) Secretary of… [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:16 pm
The case of Jenny Rubin, et al. v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
Comptroller of the Treasury of Maryland v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm
In the case of David Miranda v Secretary of State for the Home Department, the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and three interveners ([2014] EWHC 255 (Admin)) the High Court rejected all the arguments supporting David Miranda’s application for judicial review of his detention at Heathrow Airport in August last year. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 10:16 am
Second, providing its own interpretation of the Treasury Department regulations, OFAC argues that the antiquities are not ‘contested’ within the meaning of those regulations, which, if correct, would make TRIA inapplicable here. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 11:17 am
The post Putin v. [read post]
